Why Aren’t You Watching MEN OF A CERTAIN AGE?
My husband and I tend to get a little antsy over the winter holidays, when most TV shows are on hiatus. We value that precious block of time — between 8pm and 10 pm — when the 3-year-old is in bed, the dishes have been washed, and we can finally put our feet up and watch TV. Romantic? No. Enjoyable? Ahhhh yes. So to prepare for that cold, dark 4-6 week stretch of primetime emptiness, I load up our Netflix queue with new releases or try to burn through a season of TV on DVD (recent favorites include Starz’s hilarious and underrated Party Down and the disappointing 5th season of Showtime’s Weeds).
My husband depends on me to investigate and select our television and film diet (this is all a film/media studies professor is good for, after all) and after reading some glowing reviews (also here, here and here) I suggested that we check out TNT’s new hourlong drama Men of a Certain Age. My husband tends to trust me on these matters, but I still knew it was going to be a hard sell: “So honey I think we should watch this new show. It’s about middle-aged men. It stars Ray Romano. And the guy from Quantum Leap. And some other guy who starred on a show we’ve never watched. It’s on TNT. Ummm…it’s supposed to be good…” Nevertheless, my husband agreed because, well, we had nothing else to watch. And as I mentioned, we’re TV addicts. We’ll take methadone if we can’t have heroine.
But as it turns out, Men of a Certain Age isn’t TV methadone — it’s the good stuff, people. Men focuses on three friends: Joe (Ray Romano), a recently divorced father of two teenagers, Owen (Andre Braugher), a married father of three who sells cars at his father’s dealership, and Terry (Scott Bakula), a single playboy and struggling actor. Believe me, I am normally not interested in the lives of middle-aged men — especially middling car salesmen and the owner of a party supplies store, but the show manages to make their stories compelling, amusing and touching all at the same time. What I love about Men is that it is realistically treats topics like aging, divorce, and parenthood without cynicism. Joe doesn’t bicker with his ex-wife, Sonia (Penelope Ann Miller, sporting the most unflattering haircut of all time), nor does he concoct elaborate plots to get back her back. Instead, Joe exists in the twilight between acceptance and denial — he lives in a hotel (to avoid moving into an apartment) and offers to fix things up around his (former) home. Indeed, it is often hard to tell if Joe misses his wife or simply his old life (that happened to include his wife). Sound depressing? It is. And yet…it’s not.
Here are some specific reasons to tune into Men:
1. You won’t hate Ray Romano
Okay, that was a little unfair — maybe some of you don’t hate Ray Romano. But anyone who names their sitcom Everybody Loves Raymond is kind of asking for it. Especially since Everybody Loves Raymond was such a colossal pile of shit. I tried — and repeatedly failed — to get through an entire episode of Raymond during it’s long run. But the Ray Romano in Men is both different from and similar to his character on Raymond — there’s the dopey look, the ennui of marriage and children, the humiliations of middle age — but as New York Times critic Alessandra Stanley put it “Joe is what would happen to sitcom Raymond if his wife left him, his parents died, and he started to hate his job.” Romano’s Joe is a chronic gambler (part of the reason behind why his wife left him) with crippling anxiety (part of behind why he failed to become a pro golfer) who misses his old, pre-divorce life. His predicaments, such as a tragicomic attempt at seducing a new date with sexually charged instant messages, are both uncomfortable to watch yet extremely real. Joe needs a hug and Romano plays him just right that the viewer wants to give him one.
2. Andre Braugher’s gut
In one episode of Men Braugher’s Owen is talking to his wife, Melissa (Lisa Gay Hamilton), as he dresses for work. He sits down on the bed, shirtless, his man boobs and formidable middle-aged gut on full display. This moment is not played for laughs, nor is it necessary to the narrative (he could have just as easily performed the scene wearing an undershirt). Rather, Braugher’s gut is simply a detail of the mise en scene, a reality of middle age. The scene is intimate, personal. Marriage — after so many years — is about sleep apnea machines (which Owen must use nightly) and bellies that have gone soft. These realities do not seem to bother Melissa, however. Their relationship is tender and real.
3. It’s a little bit sad, a little bit funny, a little bit disturbing
Not many shows can master this mix of emotions. In fact, off the top of my head I can only think of one other show that mixes these various emotions without plunging any one character into caricature: My So-Called Life (my guess is that Freaks and Geeks strikes a similar tone, but sadly I have not yet watched this series). Men manages to keep its humor, tragedy, realism, and awkwardness in a fine balance throughout each episode. One great example of this occurs in the pilot episode, when the three friends are driving to through the woods and accidentally hit a possum with their SUV. Joe worries that the animal might be suffering ad backs up over it (complete with a sickening thump noise) in an effort to put it out of its misery. But when the men look in the rearview mirror, they see the possum crawl off into the woods. Later that night, Joe and his bookie, Manfro (Jon Manfrellotti), with whom he has established an unlikely friendship, head back to the woods to seek out the possum — Joe simply cannot stomach that the animal might be in pain as a result of his actions. When the two men finally locate the (now dead) animal, we see Joe pick up a large rock and it seems that this will turn into a scene of violence. Is Joe going to vent his frustrations by bashing in the head of this dead animal? The next shot reveals that Joe is actually using that rock (and several more) to build a cairn for the animal. Some might call this storyline overkill (excuse the pun) but it really illuminates Joe’s character. As Manfro observes, “You’re weird, Joe.” I also like that the scene could have gone either way — violent or tender.
4. The lighting
I‘ve blogged about lighting before in my praise of Mad Men — not because I am a lighting aficionado, but because television shows do not always take their lighting design seriously. The light in Men of a Certain Age is beautiful and always appropriate for its Southern California setting.
Lucky for me, Men of a Certain Age has been renewed for a second season, despite its low ratings. But I’m still going to urge you to watch it because I promise, you will thank me later. Even if you hate Ray Romano. So go on, give it a try. You can watch full episodes at the TNT website. I recommend “Go with the Flow,” a funny but touching episode devoted to Joe’s first date in 20 years.
So what do you think? Are you watching Men of a Certain Age? Did you watch it and hate it? Please share your thoughts below…
8 thoughts on “Why Aren’t You Watching MEN OF A CERTAIN AGE?”
February 13, 2010 at 4:37 pm
You knew I’d pipe up on this one, didn’t you? =)
First, I really, really like MEN OF A CERTAIN AGE; and, like you, I’m soooo glad it was renewed for another season. (But from The Twitter, you already knew that.) Nonetheless, I’m glad you point out Braugher’s gut and that it is simply “a detail of the mise-en-scene.” Right. It is just there — not overemphasized, not brought to our attention with close-ups, etc. It’s perfectly done — it’s just a part of being “a certain age.”
From our previous conversations on Twitter (and on other blogs), I also know you dislike EVERYBODY LOVES RAYMOND — and you (probably) also know that it holds a special place in my heart. So I wanted to mention a couple of things, if that’s alright.
First, you write that “anyone who names their sitcom Everybody Loves Raymond is kind of asking for it.” True, but may I take Romano’s side just for a sec? Fans of the show (and of David Letterman, whose company, Worldwide Pants, produced RAYMOND) know that Romano fought CBS tooth and nail to eliminate that title from the sitcom. He hated it. “Believe me, I didn’t come up with [the title],” Romano assures us in many interviews. “We used it as a working title. But when CBS wanted to use it for the show, I fought it hard. I even pleaded with Moonves ‘Please, that can’t be the name!'” (More here: http://www.patriciaheatononline.com/elrarticles/ray_readers_digest.html). Frequently a guest on Letterman, Romano would always cringe when the host announced the show’s title. Anyway, just thought I’d share…
You also write that “Everybody Loves Raymond was such a colossal pile of shit. I tried — and repeatedly failed — to get through an entire episode of Raymond during it’s long run.” Just wondering what your thoughts are on SEINFELD, which, I would argue, is actually very similar to RAYMOND.
February 13, 2010 at 5:10 pm
I had no idea that Romano was so against the show’s title. Still, that doesn’t alter the fact that the show was still shit. : )
But now I am intrigued: I do not see the SEINFELD/RAYMOND parallels. How are these shows similar?
I should also add here that I am not a huge SEINFELD fan, at least not anymore. I enjoyed it during its initial run but now when I watch reruns I find it incredibly annoying. And I can only tolerate CURB YOUR ENTHUSIASM in small doses. Does that make me a self-hating Jew?
February 14, 2010 at 10:30 am
Ahhh, you’ll have to wait until I finish my essay comparing RAYMOND and SEINFELD!
So, I’m guessing you wouldn’t have enjoyed my course that considers SEINFELD (and a little of CURB) for 15 weeks straight?! =)
February 13, 2010 at 8:24 pm
I echo your praise of MoaCA. Of course I’m a bit more in the target demo, especially with it debuting on my birthday when I hit… a certain age.
I do think Braugher’s gut is a bit more than mise-en-scene, as it become his defining feature. I loved in the episode “Mind’s Eye,” as referrals to the car dealership kept asking for someone “chunky,” “stout,” etc. until the final one said “I’m looking for the fat man.”
But for me the impressive achievement is taking 3 actors whom I thought I knew and transforming them into more than I thought they would be (well, Braugher was always brilliant dramatically, but I didn’t know how he’d play comedy). And then making a male-centered family melodrama that doesn’t mask itself as a cop show, medical show, etc. It’s really unlike anything else on the air.
(And I do like ELR, but I won’t try to explain why here…)
February 14, 2010 at 10:26 am
Hi, Jason. Just to clarify, my comments above were referring strictly to that episode Amanda mentions, when Owen was sitting on the bed, getting dressed, etc. But yeah, I agree with you that “Braugher’s gut is BECOMING his defining feature.” (i.e., the son’s video taping, Owen overeating, etc.) It just wasn’t in that episode, I didn’t think.
PS. Glad to see that someone else likes RAYMOND. All of this discussion is going to force me to finish writing my essay on RAYMOND/SEINFELD!
February 14, 2010 at 5:37 pm
I should clarify here that I meant Braugher’s weight was a mere detail only in the particular scene I cited — in other words, it isn’t ridiculed or even addressed in any way in the scene and yet it appears in all of its glorious doughiness. Obviously though, his weight is a big issue for his character (I also loved the “fat man” episode).
February 14, 2010 at 5:38 pm
And Kelli, yes I’d really like to read that essay someday!
March 15, 2010 at 12:19 am
I watched Men of a Certain Age, and really enjoyed it. I tend to avoid most “big 3 network” dramas, so many of them really fall flat. But this show is well written and acted, and approaches subjects from a decidedly adult point of view – which I appreciate. I’ll be tuning in Season 2 – and I think your post is right on the money.